Forecast Lab
ExperimentalThis panel fits the Gutenberg–Richter relation log10(N) = a − b·M to the live USGS catalog for the Philippine bounding box, then converts the implied annual rate of M ≥ m into a Poisson probability over a given time window. It describes the recent catalog — it does not predict any specific earthquake.
Omori–Utsu aftershock decay
- Mainshock
- M 7.8 · 2026-06-07
- p
- 0.71
- c (days)
- 0.001
- K
- 22.11
- R²
- 0.71
Declustered background rate (ETAS-style)
- Total events
- 164
- After declustering
- 111
- Window
- 29 days
- Background rate
- 3.86 events / day
Bayesian rate posterior (Gamma–Poisson)
- M ≥ 5 · obs
- 51 in 0.08 yr
- Posterior mean
- 50.98 /yr
- 95% CrI
- 38.41 – 65.32 /yr
- P(M≥5, 30d)
- 98.5%
- — 95% CrI
- 95.7% – 99.5%
- M ≥ 6 · obs
- 5 in 0.08 yr
- Posterior mean
- 1.38 /yr
- P(M≥6, 1yr)
- 74.8%
Prior: Gamma(α=4, β=1) on M≥5 and Gamma(α=2, β=5) on M≥6, reflecting the long-term Philippine catalog.
ETAS productivity (Felzer–Brodsky)
- α (productivity)
- 0.30
- K (at M=Mmain)
- 10.72
- Mainshock M ≥
- 4.0
- Mc
- 2.5
- Bins fit
- 6
- Window
- 7d · 100km
α near 1 is consistent with self-similar aftershock productivity. Lower α implies large mainshocks are relatively less productive than scaling predicts.
Methodology notes
Magnitude of completeness Mc = 3. b-values near 1.0 are typical of tectonically active regions; lower values indicate relatively more large events. Uncertainty on b is the Aki (1965) maximum-likelihood standard error σb = b / √N.
Confidence intervals on probabilities are 95% intervals derived from a Wald-type approximation on log(λ); they widen rapidly when the catalog is thin. The Omori–Utsu fit linearizes log n(t) = log K − p · log(t + c) with a grid search over c. The "background rate" is produced by a simple magnitude-dependent space-time declustering (a stand-in for full ETAS — Ogata 1988 — until full ETAS is implemented).
Bayesian update uses a Gamma(α₀, β₀) prior on the annual rate λ and Poisson likelihood, yielding Gamma(α₀+n, β₀+T) posterior; the 95% credible interval is computed from the Wilson–Hilferty chi-square approximation. ETAS productivity α is estimated by least squares on log10 Naft(M) across mainshock magnitude bins (Felzer & Brodsky 2006). The declustered background rate is a stand-in for full ETAS MLE (Ogata 1988), which is planned.
Planned: full ETAS MLE inference (Ogata 1988), spatial Hawkes intensity maps, and CSEP-style Brier / log-loss / ROC-AUC validation against retrospective Philippine catalogs.